|
|
 |

| The ‘Remora’
is a rescue/intervention system based on a concept patented by Dr.
Phil Nuytten. The prototype was built by Can-Dive Marine Services
Ltd., Hard Suits International Inc., and International Submarine
Engineering Ltd. for the Australian Submarine Corporation and the
Royal Australian Navy. ‘Remora’ passed all of its final
sea trials, including a mate-up in deep water, and was delivered
in 1996. |
| Following
the specific work on the Remora (or more properly, the ‘Articulating
Pressure Conduit’), Nuytten spent considerable time reviewing
the history of submarine sinkings, crew rescue, crew escape, current
worldwide assistance capabilities, and depth capabilities. The conclusion
reached was that the Remora/Deep Submergence Rescue Vehicle (DSRV)
style of outside intervention and rescue was not optimal, and the
self-rescue was the only reasonable approach, for a number of reasons.
After in-house study, Nuytco Research entered into a formal contract
with Canada's Department of National Defense (DND) and the Defense
and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine (DCIEM) for the purpose
of determining the feasibility of a one-atmosphere self-rescue system. |
|
This system in known as the ‘Personnel
Pressure Suite’ (PPS) and comprises an escape suit that
can be tolerate to full outside pressure to the collapse depth
of the submarine, as well as full internal pressure in the even
that unit must be used to escape from an already-pressurized,
disabled submarine (DISSUB). The study was successfully completed
in 2000. Subsequently, an external/internal pressure joint was
developed as well as an ultra light weight, small volume PPS hull.
The Exosuit torso was used for preliminary evaluation, but the
final individual package could be as small as a sixteen by twenty-four
inch cylinder.
Nuytco has made several presentations on this
proposed system to NATO submarine work groups on submarine escape/rescue
with good reception. The concept is an order of magnitude less
expensive than intervention-style rescue systems and would give
small submarine groups the same rescue capabilities as the larger
military powers. There is no situation where the availability
of an individual self-rescue system would preclude outside rescue
or intervention if circumstances favour that method and the physical
assets are available. The capital costs of equipping a 50 man
crew with PPS systems is far less than even the proportioned cost
of maintaining a DSRV or Remora-style capability. Virtually all
DISSUBs begin to take on internal pressure as a consequence of
being disabled. As a result, crew are, almost always, at risk
of some degree of tissue saturation.
By moving the base of rescue from the surface
to the DISSUB itself, the difficulty and time-consuming operations
of locating the DISSUB and placing the rescue assets in secure
position above it are eliminated. Since the rescue vessel is not
required to carry DSRV style hardware nor the associated handling
system, it becomes a means of recovering and transporting crew
of the DISSUB and virtually any vessel of opportunity will serve.
A most effective combination is the use of the PPS (in articulated
or capsule form) to provide for DISSUB escape and internal/external
pressure protection and the subsequent recovery of surfaced crew
by means of large, long-range amphibious aircraft such as the
U.S. Navy's Lockheed Martin C-130 on floats or the Russian Anatov
Series.
Interested parties are encouraged to contact Nuytco if they wish
to receive more detailed information. Please note that signing
a non-disclosure agreement is a requirement.
|
|